<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Changes App Listing Behavior in AppStore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/apple-changes-app-listing-behavior-in-appstore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/apple-changes-app-listing-behavior-in-appstore/</link>
	<description>About iPhone Apps, AppStore &#38; More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ortwin Gentz</title>
		<link>http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/apple-changes-app-listing-behavior-in-appstore/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Ortwin Gentz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/?p=47#comment-48</guid>
		<description>I agree that your solution would improve the App Store quite a bit. It&#039;s probably the single easiest measure with the largest impact for Apple to take.

But it&#039;s just one piece in the puzzle. IMO, the root of the problem is the bad visibility of quality apps. So, in addition to that I propose to

- split Popularity into Sales Rank (based on gross revenues) and Customer Rating and offer sorting on either one
- change the default sort criterion in iTunes and on the device (genre section) to the Sales Rank instead of the Release Date
- Indicate the rating and number of reviews in the listing page in iTunes same as on the device
- offer collaborative filtering or Genius™: &quot;these apps could be interesting for you&quot; based on other customers with similar purchases

Also, to me it looks like the last update date still governs the sort order and not the first release date. see http://twitpic.com/n23e - these apps are not new by far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that your solution would improve the App Store quite a bit. It&#8217;s probably the single easiest measure with the largest impact for Apple to take.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s just one piece in the puzzle. IMO, the root of the problem is the bad visibility of quality apps. So, in addition to that I propose to</p>
<p>- split Popularity into Sales Rank (based on gross revenues) and Customer Rating and offer sorting on either one<br />
- change the default sort criterion in iTunes and on the device (genre section) to the Sales Rank instead of the Release Date<br />
- Indicate the rating and number of reviews in the listing page in iTunes same as on the device<br />
- offer collaborative filtering or Genius™: &#8220;these apps could be interesting for you&#8221; based on other customers with similar purchases</p>
<p>Also, to me it looks like the last update date still governs the sort order and not the first release date. see <a href="http://twitpic.com/n23e" rel="nofollow">http://twitpic.com/n23e</a> &#8211; these apps are not new by far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tap tap tap ~ How to prevent the App Store from becoming the Crap Store</title>
		<link>http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/apple-changes-app-listing-behavior-in-appstore/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>tap tap tap ~ How to prevent the App Store from becoming the Crap Store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/?p=47#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] bumping to the front of the queue via overly frequent app updates [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bumping to the front of the queue via overly frequent app updates [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: touchmeme</title>
		<link>http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/apple-changes-app-listing-behavior-in-appstore/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>touchmeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 05:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/?p=47#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Mark,

This is not specific a specific. I think they changed the behavior for all users. It is an interesting move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>This is not specific a specific. I think they changed the behavior for all users. It is an interesting move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zerogate</title>
		<link>http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/apple-changes-app-listing-behavior-in-appstore/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Zerogate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/?p=47#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Hello,

Nov. 3rd, 2008

Does anyone know why the store is only showing the first 100 apps? I can only &quot;load 25 more&quot; four times from my phone.  I have ATT.  Is this happening everywhere?

Thanks,

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Nov. 3rd, 2008</p>
<p>Does anyone know why the store is only showing the first 100 apps? I can only &#8220;load 25 more&#8221; four times from my phone.  I have ATT.  Is this happening everywhere?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jusayan</title>
		<link>http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/apple-changes-app-listing-behavior-in-appstore/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jusayan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/?p=47#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I just noticed something today (Oct 14). On the front page of the Utilities category, Luminaire and Clinometer are both showing Release dates for Oct 14 and Oct 13.

They&#039;re both established apps, so these look like updates. Did something change today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed something today (Oct 14). On the front page of the Utilities category, Luminaire and Clinometer are both showing Release dates for Oct 14 and Oct 13.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re both established apps, so these look like updates. Did something change today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MobileApps &#187; Blog Archive &#187; App Store listing order</title>
		<link>http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/apple-changes-app-listing-behavior-in-appstore/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>MobileApps &#187; Blog Archive &#187; App Store listing order</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/?p=47#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] of the changes affects the way applications are listed in their category. There&#8217;s a good blogpost by Krishna Vegesna which describes the consequences of the previous ordering of the applications. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the changes affects the way applications are listed in their category. There&#8217;s a good blogpost by Krishna Vegesna which describes the consequences of the previous ordering of the applications. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan Duddridge</title>
		<link>http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/apple-changes-app-listing-behavior-in-appstore/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Duddridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/?p=47#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Just to chime in here. I did go into iTunes Connect and reset my publish date. I thought maybe my email to Apple caused them to fix it, but perhaps I really fixed it myself by resetting the availability date. Who knows. But Tap Forms now has a release date of September 28th, 2008 instead of my original upload date of September 16th.

Here&#039;s to hoping that Tap Forms 1.0.1 will get approved soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to chime in here. I did go into iTunes Connect and reset my publish date. I thought maybe my email to Apple caused them to fix it, but perhaps I really fixed it myself by resetting the availability date. Who knows. But Tap Forms now has a release date of September 28th, 2008 instead of my original upload date of September 16th.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to hoping that Tap Forms 1.0.1 will get approved soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Loophole, Amazon Video on Demand Troubles, Last.fm Update, Facebook Redesign, Broong - Free Line 10/2/08</title>
		<link>http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/apple-changes-app-listing-behavior-in-appstore/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone Loophole, Amazon Video on Demand Troubles, Last.fm Update, Facebook Redesign, Broong - Free Line 10/2/08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/?p=47#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] than those that stay &#8220;hidden&#8221; at the bottom. According to more than a few published reports, some programmers have been using this system to their advantage for some time now. Apple is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than those that stay &#8220;hidden&#8221; at the bottom. According to more than a few published reports, some programmers have been using this system to their advantage for some time now. Apple is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/apple-changes-app-listing-behavior-in-appstore/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/?p=47#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Why not keep those 3 links just fro NEW apps, and install a 4th link JUST for updates. 

A LOT of us like a daily browse for apps- and find more like this than a search.

It is also nice to track an apps updates until it gets the features that you desire before purchase.

This new listing has removed all that, it simply needed a seperate filter just for updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not keep those 3 links just fro NEW apps, and install a 4th link JUST for updates. </p>
<p>A LOT of us like a daily browse for apps- and find more like this than a search.</p>
<p>It is also nice to track an apps updates until it gets the features that you desire before purchase.</p>
<p>This new listing has removed all that, it simply needed a seperate filter just for updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THETA Poker</title>
		<link>http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/apple-changes-app-listing-behavior-in-appstore/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>THETA Poker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://touchmeme.wordpress.com/?p=47#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Excellent news! Absolutely perfect timing too, as THETA Poker, the strongest and easiest-to-use Texas Hold &#039;Em game for the iPhone, was just released in the App Store.  Unfortunately, I don&#039;t see it on the New Apps page yet, although you can search for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent news! Absolutely perfect timing too, as THETA Poker, the strongest and easiest-to-use Texas Hold &#8216;Em game for the iPhone, was just released in the App Store.  Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t see it on the New Apps page yet, although you can search for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
